Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Dissection in a Pediatric Patient With Turner Syndrome: A Simulation.

Aortic dissection is exceedingly rare in the pediatric population. However, it is much more common among children and adolescents with certain underlying syndromes, including Turner syndrome. Furthermore, aortic dissection carries significant mortality without prompt diagnosis and management. Therefore, pediatric emergency providers should know how to recognize and treat pediatric aortic dissection in a patient with Turner syndrome. We designed this simulation for pediatric emergency medicine fellows. A simulated adolescent female patient with a known history of Turner syndrome presents with chest pain, tachycardia, and hypertension. Participants must order and interpret the appropriate diagnostics, diagnose aortic dissection, and manage aortic dissection adequately. This simulation was completed by six pediatric emergency medicine fellows and one pediatric resident. After completing the simulation, six participants (85.7%) provided anonymous feedback on a five-point Likert scale (one = strongly disagree, five = strongly agree). Feedback was positive, and participants agreed that the case content was relevant to their clinical practice and that the event will improve their clinical practice. This simulation encourages participants to recognize and manage pediatric aortic dissection in patients with Turner syndrome. Participants felt that the simulation was relevant and will improve their clinical practice.

Where in the world: Mapping medical student learning using the Social and Structural Determinants of Health Curriculum Assessment Tool (SSDH CAT).

INTRODUCTION: Addressing the Social and Structural Determinants of Health (SSDH) is a primary strategy for attaining health equity. Teaching and learning about SSDH has increased across medical schools throughout the world; however, the published literature describing these efforts continues to be limited and many unknowns persist including what should be taught and by whom, what teaching methods and settings should be used, and how medical learners should be assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on published studies, input from experts in the field, and elements from the framework developed by the National Academy of Medicine, we created a universal Social and Structural Determinants of Health Curriculum Assessment Tool (SSDH CAT) to assist medical educators to assess existing SSDH curricular content, ascertain critical gaps, and categorize educational methods, delivery, and assessment techniques and tools that could help inform curricular enhancements to advance the goal of training a health care workforce focused on taking action to achieve health equity. To test the usefulness of the tool, we applied the SSDH CAT to map SSDH-related curriculum at a US-based medical school. RESULTS: By applying the SSDH CAT to our undergraduate medical school curriculum, we recognized that our SSDH curriculum relied too heavily on lectures, emphasized knowledge without sufficient skill building, and lacked objective assessment measures. As a result of our curricular review, we added more skill-based activities such as using evidence-based tools for screening patients for social needs, and created and implemented a universal, longitudinal, experiential community health curriculum. DISCUSSION: We created a universal SSDH CAT and applied it to assess and improve our medical school's SSDH curriculum. The SSDH CAT provides a starting point for other medical schools to assess their SSDH content as a strategy to improve teaching and learning about health equity, and to inspire students to act on the SSDH.

Expert Consensus Guidelines for Assessing Students on the Social Determinants of Health.

PHENOMENON: Assessment and evaluation guidelines inform programmatic changes necessary for educational effectiveness. Presently, no widely accepted guidelines exist for educators to assess learners and evaluate programs regarding social determinants of health (SDOH) during physician and physician assistant (PA) education. We sought to garner expert consensus about effective SDOH learner assessment and program evaluation, so as to make recommendations for best practices related to SDOH education. APPROACH: We used a Delphi approach to conduct our study (September 2019 to December 2020). To administer our Delphi survey, we followed a three-step process: 1) literature review, 2) focus groups and semi-structured interviews, 3) question development and refinement. The final survey contained 72 items that addressed SDOH content areas, assessment methods, assessors, assessment integration, and program evaluation. Survey participants included 14 SDOH experts at US medical schools and PA programs. The survey was circulated for three rounds seeking consensus, and when respondents reached consensus on a particular question, that question was removed from subsequent rounds. FINDINGS: The geographically diverse sample of experts reached consensus on many aspects of SDOH assessment and evaluation. The experts selected three important areas to assess learners' knowledge, skills, and attitudes about SDOH. They identified assessment methods that were "essential", "useful, but not essential", and "not necessary." The essential assessment methods are performance rating scales for knowledge and attitudes and skill-based assessments. They favored faculty and patients as assessors, as well as learner self-assessment, over assessments conducted by other health professionals. Questions about separation versus incorporation of SDOH assessment with other educational assessment did not yield consensus opinion. The experts reached consensus on priority outcome measures to evaluate a school's SDOH program which included student attitudes toward SDOH, Competence-Based Assessment Scales, and the percentage of graduates involved in health equity initiatives. INSIGHTS: Based on the Delphi survey results, we make five recommendations that medical and PA educators can apply now when designing learner assessments and evaluating SDOH programming. These recommendations include what should be assessed, using what methods, who should do the assessments, and how they should be incorporated into the curriculum. This expert consensus should guide future development of an assessment and evaluation toolkit to optimize SDOH education and clinical practice.Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2022.2045490 .

Assessment and Evaluation in Social Determinants of Health Education: a National Survey of US Medical Schools and Physician Assistant Programs.

BACKGROUND: Social determinants of health (SDOH) curricular content in medical schools and physician assistant programs are increasing. However, there is little understanding of current practice in SDOH learner assessment and program evaluation, or what the best practices are. OBJECTIVE: Our study aim was to describe the current landscape of assessment and evaluation at US medical schools and physician assistant programs as a first step in developing best practices in SDOH education. DESIGN: We conducted a national survey of SDOH educators from July to December 2020. The 55-item online survey covered learner assessment methods, program evaluation, faculty training, and barriers to effective assessment and evaluation. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred six SDOH educators representing 26% of medical schools and 23% of PA programs in the USA completed the survey. KEY RESULTS: Most programs reported using a variety of SDOH learner assessment methods. Faculty and self were the most common assessors of learners' SDOH knowledge, attitudes, and skills. Common barriers to effective learner assessment were lack of agreement on "SDOH competency" and lack of faculty training in assessment. Programs reported using evaluation results to refine curricular content, identify the need for new content, and improve assessment strategies. CONCLUSIONS: We identified a heterogeneity of SDOH assessment and evaluation practices among programs, as well as gaps and barriers in their educational practices. Specific guidance from accrediting bodies and professional organizations and agreement on SDOH competency as well as providing faculty with time, resources, and training will improve assessment and evaluation practice and ensure SDOH education is effective for students, patients, and communities.

Career Development in Pediatric Emergency Medicine: What Do We Need?

OBJECTIVES: The Women in Pediatric Emergency Medicine (PEM) subcommittee of the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Emergency Medicine identified 2 top priorities for 2021: career development and mentorship/sponsorship. The objective of this study was to catalog and delineate the career development domains for women physicians in PEM. METHODS: After a review of the literature to identify the key areas for gaps for women in PEM, we used Q sort methodology to elicit domains for this subcommittee to address by survey of a national sample. RESULTS: One hundred fourteen discrete potential areas of interest for career development were identified by the working group based on salient themes from the literature and personal experiences. Forty-one Women in PEM subcommittee members (27%) completed the survey. The career development topics were sorted into the domains of personal (40.4%; n = 46), administrative (28.1%; n = 32), research (10.5%; n = 12), teaching (10.5%; n = 12), service (7.0%; n = 8), and clinical (3.5%; n = 4). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the career development needs of women in PEM include a range of personal, teaching, research, administrative, clinical, and service domains. However, more than two-thirds of the career development topics were categorized into just 2 domains, administrative and personal.

Taking the Pulse on Pediatric Simulation: A National Survey of Pediatric Residency Programs' Simulation Practices and Challenges.

OBJECTIVES: There is abundant literature on simulation use in individual pediatric residency programs but limited overall data on simulation in US pediatric residency programs. This study sought to determine how US pediatric residency programs use simulation for teaching and assessment and the challenges programs face in their use of simulation. METHODS: The Association of Pediatric Program Director's Healthcare Simulation in Pediatrics Learning Community members developed a 15-multipart question survey on the use of simulation in US pediatric residency programs using best practices in survey design. The survey was distributed electronically to US pediatric residency program directors. Qualitative questions were analyzed by content analysis and quantitative questions using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 21%; respondents were disproportionately from large academic medical centers. Qualitative analysis found that respondents use simulation to teach pediatric residents in the areas of urgent/emergent situations, procedures, and communication, and common challenges to simulation implementation are time, physical resources, expertise, competing priorities, logistics, and buy-in. Quantitative analysis demonstrated that, although respondents are largely confident that their simulation programs improve resident preparedness and competence, few objectively evaluate their simulation programs. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric residency programs use simulation for similar purposes and face similar challenges. By collaborating, the resources of the national pediatric simulation community can be leveraged to collect evidence for best practices for simulation use in pediatric residency training.

Expert Consensus on Inclusion of the Social Determinants of Health in Undergraduate Medical Education Curricula.

PURPOSE: Accreditation bodies have mandated teaching social determinants of health (SDH) to medical students, but there has been limited guidance for educators on what or how to teach, and how to evaluate students' competence. To fill this gap, this study aimed to develop an SDH curricular consensus guide for teaching SDH to medical students. METHOD: In 2017, the authors used a modified Delphi technique to survey an expert panel of educators, researchers, students, and community advocates about knowledge, skills, and attitudes (KSA) and logistics regarding SDH teaching and assessment. They identified the panel and ranked a comprehensive list of topics based on a scoping review of SDH education studies and discussions with key informants. A total of 57 experts were invited. RESULTS: Twenty-two and 12 panelists participated in Delphi rounds 1 and 2, respectively. The highest-ranked items regarding KSA were "Appreciation that the SDH are some of the root causes of health outcomes and health inequities" and "How to work effectively with community health workers." The panel achieved consensus that SDH should constitute 29% of the total curriculum and be taught continuously throughout the curriculum. Multiple-choice tests were ranked lowest as an assessment method, and patient feedback was ranked highest. Panelists noted that SDH content must be a part of standardized exams to be prioritized by faculty and students. CONCLUSIONS: An expert panel endorsed essential curricular content, teaching methods, and evaluation approaches that can be used to help guide medical educators regarding SDH curriculum development.

Teaching the Social Determinants of Health in Undergraduate Medical Education: a Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: To provide optimal care, medical students should understand that the social determinants of health (SDH) impact their patients' well-being. Those charged with teaching SDH to future physicians, however, face a paucity of curricular guidance. OBJECTIVE: This review's objective is to map key characteristics from publications about teaching SDH to students in undergraduate medical education (UME). METHODS: In 2016, the authors searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane and ERIC databases, bibliographies, and MedEdPORTAL for articles published between January 2010 and November 2016. Four reviewers screened articles for eligibility then extracted and analyzed data descriptively. Scoping review methodology was used to map key concepts and curricular logistics as well as educator and student characteristics. RESULTS: The authors screened 3571 unique articles of which 22 were included in the final review. Many articles focused on community engagement (15). Experiential learning was a common instructional strategy (17) and typically took the form of community or clinic-based learning. Nearly half (10) of the manuscripts described school-wide curricula, of which only three spanned a full year. The majority of assessment was self-reported (20) and often related to affective change. Few studies objectively assessed learner outcomes (2). CONCLUSIONS: The abundance of initial articles screened highlights the growing interest in SDH in medical education. The small number of selected articles with sufficient detail for abstraction demonstrates limited SDH curricular dissemination. A lack of accepted tools or practices that limit development of robust learner or program evaluation was noted. Future research should focus on identifying and evaluating effective instructional and assessment methodologies to address this gap, exploring additional innovative teaching frameworks, and examining the specific contexts and characteristics of marginalized and underserved populations and their coverage in medical education.

Development of a Simulation-Based Interprofessional Teamwork Assessment Tool.

BACKGROUND: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Milestone projects required each specialty to identify essential skills and develop means of assessment with supporting validity evidence for trainees. Several specialties rate trainees on a milestone subcompetency related to working in interprofessional teams. A tool to assess trainee competence in any role on an interprofessional team in a variety of scenarios would be valuable and suitable for simulation-based assessment. OBJECTIVE: We developed a tool for simulation settings that assesses interprofessional teamwork in trainees. METHODS: In 2015, existing tools that assess teamwork or interprofessionalism using direct observation were systematically reviewed for appropriateness, generalizability, adaptability, ease of use, and resources required. Items from these tools were included in a Delphi method with multidisciplinary pediatrics experts using an iterative process from June 2016 to January 2017 to develop an assessment tool. RESULTS: Thirty-one unique tools were identified. A 2-stage review narrowed this list to 5 tools, and 81 items were extracted. Twenty-two pediatrics experts participated in 4 rounds of Delphi surveys, with response rates ranging from 82% to 100%. Sixteen items reached consensus for inclusion in the final tool. A global 4-point rating scale from novice to proficient was developed. CONCLUSIONS: A novel tool to assess interprofessional teamwork for individual trainees in a simulated setting was developed using a systematic review and Delphi methodology. This is the first step to establish the validity evidence necessary to use this tool for competency-based assessment.

Two Simulation Cases to Prepare for a Public Festival: Pediatric Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) Ingestion and Alcohol Toxicity.

Introduction Emergency departments (EDs) see a surge of intoxicated patients during large public summer events. These patients can be distracting and complicated for ED staff to care for. Methods We developed two cases to prepare emergency department staff for an anticipated surge of patients related to a large music festival that occurs proximal to our pediatric hospital. We developed and performed cases of simulated patients with alcohol intoxication and methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) ingestion to review medical management of these patients, as well as to review many of the social aspects of the cases. We surveyed simulation (sim) session participants to assess the degree to which the sessions were helpful and to glean ideas on how to improve sessions for future use. Results Over the course of two years, we have hosted eight simulations, for a total of 57 participants comprising various healthcare roles. We achieved an 85% response rate in the post-simulation surveys. The sessions were overall well-received and left participants feeling better prepared to care for intoxicated patients. Discussion Despite having a large number of staff from many disciplines working varied schedules, we were able to provide simulation training to many of them in preparation for an expected surge of intoxicated patients. Participants appreciated the training and gave feedback to improve sessions in the future.

Use of Simulation to Test Systems and Prepare Staff for a New Hospital Transition.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the development and key outcomes arising from the use of simulation as a method to test systems and prepare staff for a transition to a new hospital. METHODS: We describe a simulation program developed by key parties with the goal of reducing latent safety threats present at the opening of a new hospital and to train staff in new workflows. Issues identified were collected and reported to leadership. Outcomes included the number of learners reached, issues identified (grouped by theme), and results of a postmove survey of hospital-based staff. RESULTS: Approximately 258 hours of simulation were conducted, impacting 514 participants. We conducted 64 hours of system testing and 196 hours of training during the main orientation process. Approximately 641 unique issues were identified (175 equipment, 136 code alarm, 174 barriers to care, and 156 incorrect signage). In a hospital-wide survey, 38% reported simulation as part of their training (39% of nurses and 23% of physicians). 43% of survey respondents reported multidisciplinary simulations; 55% of simulation attendees felt that the simulation was helpful and eased their transition to the new hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Systems testing and education using simulation can play a meaningful role in new facility training. Key lessons included early planning, allocation of resources to the effort, flexibility to adapt to changes, and planned integration with other training activities. A formal a priori plan to address issues identified during the process is necessary.

A Brief Boot Camp for 4th-Year Medical Students Entering into Pediatric and Family Medicine Residencies.

The transition from medical student to intern is a challenging process characterized by a steep learning curve. Focused courses targeting skills necessary for success as a resident have increased self-perceived preparedness, confidence, and medical knowledge. Our aim was to create a brief educational intervention for 4th-year medical students entering pediatric, family practice, and medicine/pediatric residencies to target skills necessary for an internship. The curriculum used a combination of didactic presentations, small group discussions, role-playing, facilitated debriefing, and simulation-based education. Participants completed an objective structured clinical exam requiring synthesis and application of multiple boot camp elements before and after the elective. Participants completed anonymous surveys assessing self-perceived preparedness for an internship, overall and in regards to specific skills, before the elective and after the course. Participants were asked to provide feedback about the course. Using checklists to assess performance, students showed an improvement in performing infant lumbar punctures (47.2% vs 77.0%; p < 0.01, 95% CI for the difference 0.2, 0.4%) and providing signout (2.5 vs. 3.9 (5-point scale) p < 0.01, 95% CI for the difference 0.6, 2.3). They did not show an improvement in communication with a parent. Participants demonstrated an increase in self-reported preparedness for all targeted skills, except for obtaining consults and interprofessional communication. There was no increase in reported overall preparedness. All participants agreed with the statements, "The facilitators presented the material in an effective manner," "I took away ideas I plan to implement in internship," and "I think all students should participate in a similar experience." When asked to assess the usefulness of individual modules, all except order writing received a mean Likert score > 4. A focused boot camp addressing key knowledge and skills required for pediatric-related residencies was well received and led to improved performance of targeted skills and increased self-reported preparedness in many targeted domains.

Pediatric Boot Camp Series: Obtaining a Consult, Discussing Difficult News.

INTRODUCTION: Transitioning from medical student to intern requires individuals to possess medical knowledge, clinical skills, and the ability to communicate with a wide variety of health care professional as well as patients and their families. New doctors may be expected to function within the health care team without having received explicit instruction in communication previously. The materials associated with this publication are intended to be used as resources for small-group education of graduating medical students entering into pediatric, family medicine, or emergency medicine residencies. METHODS: Four pediatric cases serve as the focus points for discussion and role-play around calling consultants and discussing difficult news with families and patients. Brief didactics and detailed facilitator notes help prime learning and guide discussion. The included facilitator notes and slide sets are part of the comprehensive materials necessary to implement this 4-hour course at your own institution. RESULTS: This curriculum has been used since 2012 with graduating medical students entering into pediatric, family medicine, and emergency medicine residencies at two institutions within the United States. Feedback has been overwhelmingly positive, and students have reported increased confidence in their ability to communicate with families and other health care providers. DISCUSSION: This publication is the second part of a two-part curriculum but may be used independently of the first part. Although the cases are based on pediatrics, the content regarding communication is universal to many medical specialties.

Targeting Simulation-Based Assessment for the Pediatric Milestones: A Survey of Simulation Experts and Program Directors.

OBJECTIVE: To determine which of the 21 general pediatrics milestone subcompetencies are most difficult to assess using traditional methodologies and which are best suited to simulation-based assessment. METHODS: We surveyed 2 samples: pediatric simulation experts and pediatric program directors. Respondents were asked about current use of simulation for assessment and to select 5 of the 21 pediatric subcompetencies most difficult to assess using traditional methods and the 5 best suited to simulation-based assessment. Spearman rank correlation was used to determine a correlation between how the 2 samples ranked the subcompetencies. RESULTS: Forty-eight percent (29 of 60) simulation experts and 20% (115 of 571) program directors completed the survey. Few respondents reported using simulation for summative assessment. There are clear differences across the pediatric subcompetencies in perceived difficulty of assessment and suitability to simulation-based assessment. The 3 most difficult to assess subcompetencies were "recognize ambiguity," "demonstrate emotional insight," and "identify one's own strengths and deficiencies." The subcompetencies most suitable to assessment using simulation were "interprofessional teamwork," "clinical decision making," and "effective communication." Program directors and simulation experts had high agreement for both questions: difficult to assess (rho = 0.76, P < .001) and suitable to simulation-based assessment (rho = 0.94, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Several general pediatrics milestone subcompetencies were identified by pediatric simulation experts and pediatric program directors as difficult to assess using current methodologies and as amenable to simulation-based assessment. The pediatric simulation community should target development of simulation-based assessment tools to these areas.

An Objective Structured Clinical Examination to Improve Formative Assessment for Senior Pediatrics Residents.

BACKGROUND: Residency programs are developing new methods to assess resident competence and to improve the quality of formative assessment and feedback to trainees. Simulation is a valuable tool for giving formative feedback to residents. OBJECTIVE: To develop an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) to improve formative assessment of senior pediatrics residents. METHODS: We developed a multistation examination using various simulation formats to assess the skills of senior pediatrics residents in communication and acute resuscitation. We measured several logistical factors (staffing and program costs) to determine the feasibility of such a program. RESULTS: Thirty-one residents participated in the assessment program over a 3-month period. Residents received formative feedback comparing their performance to both a standard task checklist and to peers' performance. The program required 16 faculty members per session, and had a cost of $624 per resident. CONCLUSIONS: A concentrated assessment program using simulation can be a valuable tool to assess residents' skills in communication and acute resuscitation and provide directed formative feedback. However, such a program requires considerable financial and staffing resources.

A review of dengue fever: a resurging tropical disease.

Dengue is a resurging mosquito-borne disease that is often contracted in U.S. travelers to Latin America, Asia, and the Caribbean. The clinical symptoms range from a simple febrile illness to hemorrhagic fever or shock. The clinical course has a wide range of outcomes, and adequate supportive care can reduce mortality rates dramatically. Repeated exposures to the virus can lead to a more complicated clinical course.